Reflection of English Language Teaching for High School Students Using E-LISDA E-Learning Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.1v.1i.6Keywords:
e-learning, E-LISDA, English, high school students, Learning Management System (LMS)Abstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of E-LISDA e-learning platform in English language teaching and the teachers’ challenges in using it in English language teaching at SMA Islam Sudirman Ambarawa. Two English teachers from SMA Islam Sudirman Ambarawa served as the study's subjects. Researchers used a descriptive qualitative approach to gather data through observation, documentation, and interviews. The results showed that teachers used E-LISDA to manage online learning sessions such as in the forms of sharing English materials, conducting distant classroom activities, exchanging information, and motivating students, where they have followed four out of Salmon’s five required e-learning stages, namely access and motivation, information exchange, knowledge construction, and development; the online socializing stage was absent. In using E-LISDA, teachers faced several challenges, such as unstable internet networks, electricity cuts, students’ low academic performances, and students’ practice of cheating.
References
Ahmadi, D. M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
Andewi, W., Puastuti, D., & Hastomo, T. (2023). ELT blends: A case study of using Google classroom. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2621(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142458/2925802
Cavus, N. (2015). Distance learning and learning management systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 872–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.611
Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies’, Learning to teach in the primary school. Queensland University of Technology, Australia, 71. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/tools-for-learning-technology-and-teaching-strategies
Ginting, D., Fahmi, F., Barella, Y., Hasbi, M., Kadnawi, K., Rojabi, A. R., & Zumrudiana, A. (2022). Students’ perception on TPACK practices on online language classes in the midst of pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(4), 1995-2009. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i4.23014
Hasbi, M. (2020). English Teaching Practices in Indonesia during COVID-19 Crisis. CV Raditeens.
Hasbi, M., & Sari, P. A. (2021). Difficulties in teaching English distantly using Google Classroom. In Bogor English Student And Teacher (BEST) Conference, 2, 141-149. https://pkm.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/best/article/view/816
Hastomo, T. (2021). Video conferences in teaching EFL: A case study of using Zoom. Lentera: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 14(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.52217/LENTERA.V14I1.830
Hastomo, T., & Septiyana, L. (2022). The investigation of students’ engagement in online class during pandemic COVID-19. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/JPIPFIP.V15I2.49512
Hastomo, T., Kholid, M. F. N., Muliyah, P., Septiyana, L., & Andewi, W. (2024). Exploring how video conferencing impacts students’ cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement. Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 4(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v4i2.9335
Hastomo, T., Mandasari, B., & Widiati, U. (2024). Scrutinizing Indonesian pre-service teachers’ technological knowledge in utilizing AI-powered tools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1572–1581. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21644
Irwin, C., & Berge, Z. (2006). Socialization in the online classroom. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ846714
Kholid, M. F. N., & Hastomo, T. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of Using Schoology in E-Learning: A Literature Review. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 15(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v15i1.10392
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers and Education, 53(3), 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008
Mahoney, K., & Cameron, L. (2008). An introduction to learning management systems: What is a learning management system? The features of the average LMS. Reading in Education and Technology: Proceeding of ICICTE 2008, 314–323.
Naidu, S. (2006). E-Learning A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices. E-learning.
Nur, A. (2020). The implementation of Yukblajar as e-learning platform in English learning at SMP Islam Al-Azhar 13 Surabaya, 274–282. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/22821/
Pavel, A. P., Fruth, A., & Neacsu, M. N. (2015). ICT and E-Learning – Catalysts for Innovation and Quality in Higher Education. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(15), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00409-8
Salmon, G. (2003). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. On the Horizon, 11(1), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/oth.2003.11.1.33.1
Sofyan, A. L. I. (2016). In English teaching based on Curriculum 2013.
Thabet, A, M. (2014). How effective is e-learning in teaching English? : A Case Study. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 647–669. https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Journal-of-Education-and-Human-Development-1934-7200
Urdan, T. A, & Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate e-learning: Exploring a new frontier. Analysis, 88. http://wrhambrecht.com/research/coverage/elearning/ir/ir_explore.pdf
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x
Widi, R. K. (2015). Asas Metodologi Penelitian. Syria Studies (Vol. 7). https://elibrary.bsi.ac.id/readbook/205858/asas-metodologi-penelitian-sebuah-pengenalan-dan-penuntun-langkah-demi-langkah-pelaksanaan-penelitian
