Investigating Cadets’ Experiences Learning English at a Banyuwangi Marine Academy in the Global Maritime Era

Authors

  • Muhamad Alfi Khoiruman Akademi Kelautan Banyuwangi Author
  • Doni Hadi Irawan Akademi Kelautan Banyuwangi Author
  • St. Shabibatul Rohmah Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Banyuwangi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.3v.1i.135

Keywords:

Communicative Competence, English for Maritime Purposes, Marine Cadets, Maritime Communication, Teacher-Centered Instruction

Abstract

In the era of global maritime communication, English plays a vital role as a working language for safety, coordination, and professional interaction within the international maritime industry. This study explores marine cadets’ experiences in learning English as a General Course at a Banyuwangi Marine Academy, with particular attention to how the course supports their communicative needs in maritime contexts. Employing a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations involving selected cadets enrolled in the English General Course. The data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns related to perceptions, learning challenges, and instructional practices. The findings reveal that although cadets perceive English as highly important for their future maritime careers, they consider the course insufficiently contextualized to real maritime communication demands. Key challenges include limited speaking confidence, inadequate mastery of maritime-specific terminology, and anxiety in oral communication activities. Observational data further indicate that instructional practices are predominantly teacher-centered and emphasize grammatical knowledge over communicative and experiential learning. As a result, opportunities for meaningful interaction and practical language use remain limited. This study highlights a mismatch between curriculum design and cadets’ professional expectations in the context of global maritime operations. The findings suggest the need to reconceptualize English as a General Course by integrating maritime-oriented content, learner-centered pedagogy, and communicative activities that reflect authentic maritime scenarios. Such improvements are essential to enhance cadets’ communicative competence and readiness for participation in the global maritime workforce.

References

Ahmmed, R., Sinha, B. S., Khan, Dr. R., & Islam, D. M. (2020). A needs analysis of maritime English language skills for Bangladeshi seafarers to work on-board ships. Marine Policy, 119, 104041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104041

Amundsen, T. (2025). Maritime language lecturers’ perceptions of curricular framework. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-025-00393-6

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage .

DeJonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), e000057. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057

Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2018). The Need Analysis of Maritime English Learning Materials for Nautical Students of Maritime Academy in Indonesia Based on STCW’2010 Curriculum. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p41

Fathiah, D. I., Kasim, U., & Fitriani, S. S. (2020). Exploring Maritime Cadets’ Anxiety in English Speaking. English Education Journal, 11(1), 1–18. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/download/13877/11561

Hilal, F. (2022). Instructor – Cadets Interaction in Maritime English Classroom (A Case Study at Politeknik Pelayaran Barombong). ELT Worldwide, 9(1), 28–43. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/ELT/article/view/20056

James, A. J., Schriever, U. G., Jahangiri, S., & Girgin, S. C. (2018). Improving maritime English competence as the cornerstone of safety at sea: a focus on teaching practices to improve maritime communication. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 17(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-018-0145-4

John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. (2019). Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives in full-mission simulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.013

Joko, N., & Wahyuningsih, H. (2020). Exploring the English Speaking Difficulties Faced by Cadets at Barombong Marine Polytechnic. Jurnal Penelitian, 5(3), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.46491/jp.v5i3.504

Jurkovič, V. (2022). Authentic routine ship-shore communication in the Northern Adriatic Sea area – A corpus analysis of discourse features. English for Specific Purposes, 68, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.06.002

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Khosiyono, B. H. C., Pardjono, & Priyana, J. (2021). Evaluating English Syllabus for Maritime Vocational School: Towards Redesigning a New Syllabus. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2), 1–13. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1295075

Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02514.x

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pauksztat, B. (2021). Informal relations and communication about work-related problems in two multilingual crews. Marine Policy, 130, 103767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103767

Sampson, H., & Zhao, M. (2003). Multilingual crews: communication and the operation of ships. World Englishes, 22(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00270

Sánchez-Guardiola Paredes, C., Aguaded Ramírez, E. M., & Rodríguez-Sabiote, C. (2021). Content Validation of a Semi-Structured Interview to Analyze the Management of Suffering. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111393

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

Sari, L. I., & Sari, R. H. (2024). Communication Strategies Used by Students When Leading a Simulated Toolbox Meeting: A Case in Maritime English Class in Indonesia. Journal of Maritime Research, 21(2), 349–357. https://www.jmr.unican.es/jmr/article/view/896

Wu, X., Liao, L., & DeBacker, T. K. (2016). Implementing Task-based Instruction in ESP Class — An Empirical Study in Marine Engineering English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 936. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.14

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

Khoiruman, M. A. ., Irawan, D. H. ., & Rohmah , S. S. (2026). Investigating Cadets’ Experiences Learning English at a Banyuwangi Marine Academy in the Global Maritime Era. LinguaEducare: Journal of English and Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.63324/lec.3v.1i.135